Thursday, October 30, 2014

I Generally Do Long Titles Sooooo.... The Man Who Planted Trees

So... What's up guys? If I weren't feeling to lazy to search for the images, I would have started this post with a Spongebob "Who wants to do homework at 3AM?" meme, except... I'm lazy... and it's not 2AM... and Spongebob is dead to me...

ANYWAYS.

I really enjoyed The Man Who Planted Trees. As many fellow students have astutely pointed out, it was nice to see a film that, rather than focusing on war or death or the apocalypse, focused on beauty and peace. I especially enjoyed the way the titular character was drawn and characterized. His large mustache, narrow eyes, and hunched form lended him a sort of rustic familiarity and charm. His custom of speaking very little simultaneously gave him an air of mystery, sympathy, and simplicity. Though he may have actually only boasted one or two direct quotes, I felt I knew and understood his personality and motives--- And as person who believes that any good story hinges up the believability of its characters, this was very pleasing to me. I also liked that, while they told us of his lost family, they did not focus too much on his sadness over them. While one could tell it hurt him, the man, and indeed, the story, chose to go a different route and show the peace that can be found through overcoming sorrows.

I also appreciated the narration. The speaker was very and refined, yet somehow relatable. He sounded smart without sounding snooty, and effectively communicated the sweet, bucolic tone of the story throughout while still displaying a range of emotions. The soft, colored-pencil style of the animation fit perfectly with its setting, cast, tone, and message. I've said simplicity too many times in this post already, but what the hey, it added to that. I also loved how as the man's forest grew and grew, more and more color was used-- not just within the linear, but the actual shapes as well. This was a beautiful way to symbolize the renewal the land experienced.

Perhaps my only real  critique are the moments where the man character speaks of the folks in surrounding villages. The way he speaks of them as "wild men" and "savages," it almost seems as though they are attempting to set up a future conflict. It just felt like a lot of build with no payoff to me. I understand that this was probably primarily to show how much the kind deeds of The Man Who Planted Trees changed the area, but the earlier descriptions seemed a) a bit too eerie for the overall tone of the rest of the film and b) somewhat tacked on and extraneous.

Overall, however, it was a wonderful little film!!!

Too lazy to find a proper exiting gif so here
UP NEXT:
WHATEVER IS UP NEXT
CUZ I DON'T REALLY KNOW
YUP


The Man Who Planted Trees

The film was like this:




And I was like this:



The Man Who Planted Trees was pretty! My eyes were so happy! The colored pencils made the film look warm and fuzzy and soft. I believe this really helped the emotion and the flow-y feel of the story. The colors blended together beautifully, and the style also perfectly conveyed the natural beauty of nature and the calmness of nature. Spraying the celluloid and then coloring over it is a rare method, and it looks really painful and tedious. That makes me appreciate the style even more.


The story of The Man Who Planted Trees is nice because there aren't any bad things happening. Throughout the film, we all were constantly guessing how the forest would be destroyed. I personally thought the war would destroy it or that the people at the end would try to tear it down, but they never did. Everything went smoothly, and it was a pleasant relief from the constant pessimism of most of the other films we have seen. The optimism of the story makes us feel good!

It even puts a smile on Simon Cowell's face :)

The Man Who Planted Trees

Okay so here we go:
The Man Who Planted Trees, was both appealing to the mind and to the senses, its visuals were soft and yet expressive. (they were especially enjoyable after the abrasive films that came before it (those ones hurt my eyes)) I'm still incredibly impressed at the idea of using pencil crayons for the cells (though I'm not quite sure it was worth an eye...)

Eye for animated film =/= equivalent exchange
The film's animation style seems rather french which is interesting considering its a Canadian film, I guess its just the artists style... maybe he was influenced by french style?

He's so pensive about his trees...
I donno the film in general is just incredibly visually appealing. Its not too harsh to the eyes and something about the visuals paired with the narration made the whole experience therapeutic. I particularly loved the flow of the animation, the way it was able to convey a story and contain such emotion while solely relying on subtle camera angles and transitions over harsher ones which would pull you out of the story.

Do they even have free roaming horses in France?

I've got to also say that I loved the message of the story; it was pretty inspirational to think that one man could singlehandedly change the landscape by creating rather than destroying, though I think it was a little pompous of the narrator to continually compare him to a god. Again, I donno, just a personal opinion. 

Well that's about all I've got to say; very pretty film Jose, thank you for showing it to us.



Effective Storytelling Without Excessive Visuals

I appreciate "The Man Who Planted Trees" for two primary reasons.  "The Man Who Planted Trees" deviated from the common tone of animations in our viewing list, offering solutions of hope instead of warnings against vice.  The film additionally provided contrast in its relative simplicity of image.  Despite its simplicity, the film still effectively conveyed its message.

"The Man Who Planted Trees" didn't simply ignore hardship in a bliss to generate a message of hope- its message is based on raising up and moving on from hardship.  The man who plants trees devotes his life towards creating inspiring beauty and happiness despite losing his family.  The film juxtaposes war with the tranquil, sublime forest.  If the man can overcome the loss of his family, the most fundamental aspect of a human life, then people should be able to overcome the causes of the war to create a new era of peace.

"The Man Who Planted Trees" - hope and peace
"Akira" - greed, opposition, and destruction
"The Man Who Planted Trees" also contrasts films like "Akira," "Princess Mononoke," and "Grave of the Fireflies" because of its aesthetic style.  The Anime animations contain rich levels of detail and precision, rendering all elements of the scene.  They employ a sophisticated color palette to convey emotive qualities of a scene.  "The Man Who Planted Trees," however, accomplishes the same affective qualities and power of message without such visual techniques.  Is a film better if it can convey an effective story without visual indicators of meaning?

"The Man Who Planted Trees" - simplistic lines and impressionistic dots of color

"Princess Mononoke" - dense patches of color and texture
Hi everyone,

So the main thing I really liked about The Man Who Planted Trees was the artwork of the film.  The characters and the backgrounds were very simple but it was still beautiful.


I also liked how they did not demonize people for the destruction of forests just like in Princess Mononoke. In addition, I like that the acorns symbolized rebirth and renewal.  As the forest grew the colors slowly changed.



Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Ha Just Kidding This is My Real Post. The Man Who Planted Trees: A Saga.

The Man Who Planted Trees is a really good film that is able to make an entertaining piece of animation that is full of depth, yet has little to no central conflict in the story. Usually for a story to work, a central obstacle or conflict is necessary to keep the plot moving along and to keep the audience engaged. However, for this short the whole point of the plot is the lack of change and conflict. It is a refreshing change in a genre that is fraught with twist endings, dramatic tension, and bittersweet results. The story focuses solely on the pure good one person can do in the world. The visual style adds to this story of hope and positivity with the pastel colors and whimsical movements.



Look at this sad farmer. He really needs a shower. And smaller hands.


Look at these happy family in the forest they didn't help plant. What free loaders.

The progression of the colors with the story (bleak, neutral colors in the beginning to the bright, soft pastels in the end) also add to the entire feel of the film and its message. The film looks at how individuals can impact so many lives. The Old Man never did his deeds out of the want for recognition or the selfish want to be remembered, he did it for the land and the future generations to enjoy. It would be nice if more old people felt this way about the Earth now. And that is all I have to say.





The Man Who Had Awesome Art Techniques

Frederic Back was a very well known animator. He made 9 different animated shorts, 4 of which were nominated for Academy Awards, and won 2. Most notable of his films was The Man Who Planted Trees, which we saw in class today. What made his work special? I Internet explored!

One thing Frederic was known for was drawing on Frosted celluloids. Frosted cels made it possible to use colored pencils, chalk, and crayon on celluloid surfaces that would ordinarily be too smooth to make it possible. This allowed him to get a bright, colorful style while still having a semi-transparent background. Strangely enough, he didn't develop this style until far into his career. Back's first film to use the frosted cel technique was All Nothing. After that, he only made three more short films before his death in 2013, one of which was The Man Who Planted Trees.

Another interesting tidbit about his work is that one of his films, The Creation of Birds, used paper cutout puppets. The characters in this film were made by cutting out paper and treating them like stop-motion puppets. However, unlike Reiniger, who patented this technique, he used full color, making another beautiful animated creation. Overall, his animation techniques were stunning and his work was incredibly famous, especially noting his success at the Academy Awards.

I loved The Man Who Planted Trees. It was easily one of my favorite films in this class, especially compared to the films shown earlier in the day. I didn't enjoy a tale of gluttony animated disgustingly and relatively lazily with the moral thrown in my face gruesomely. But a beautiful, inspiring tale that managed to fit in the moral nicely made for an amazing viewing experience.

I learned about all this through a combination of film-watchings, Jose-teachings, and the magical powers of...

The Man Who Planted Trees: Holy Dang


The Man Who Planted Trees by Frederic Back is unique and immersive film with a beautiful mesh of expertly adapted visual storytelling, especially with the contrast of colors and how they transition throughout the film. 

In the beginning, Back sticks to earthy sepia tones that describe the barren atmosphere of the Alps and conversely the warm solitude of Elzeard Bouffer's home. As the film transitions with the growing forest and the damage it faces, the colors melt and merge like many different moving impressionist paintings. The colors help transition from desolate to bountiful and full of life. It's a technique I'd really love to explore on my own because this is a really gorgeous movie that's really inspirational to me.

Similar to Princess Mononoke, the sense of scale for the landscape actually bolsters the message of the film, especially showing off the trees to show off Elzeard's hardwork. I thought the message of it was really atypical and interesting, that if people knew that a man was responsible for the growing of the forest, they'd intervene, but they lived on the assumption that it was a work of nature and they left it alone and thrived within it. It's an atypical portrayal especially with films that contain environmentally fueled messages tend to go against humans. But it's interesting because the growing of the forest is like the development of a dream and when people intervene with someone's dream, it tends to get warped and changed and becomes impure, whereas keeping the secret keeps the dream pure and natural. And it maintained the optimism of a pure dream throughout a film. Elezard carefully develops and creates his dream by caring for the seeds and planting them quietly as they grow into a bigger life fulfillment.

There need to be more films with this kind of narrative and gentle, creative style. It's ridiculously inspiring to me as someone who works really hard to write optimistic narratives even when darkness can fall upon the viewer (depicting the suffering villages and wartime). It's just a very subtle, simple, but expressive and gorgeous film and I really hope I can make something that inspired someday. 

A depiction of the modern man who plants trees.


The Man Who Planted Trees: How It Shows The Beauty of An Animator's Work

"When I consider that a single man, relying only on his own simple physical and moral resources, was able to transform a desert into this land of Canaan, I am convinced that despite everything, the human condition is truly admirable. But when I take into account the constancy, the greatness of soul, and the selfless dedication that was needed to bring about this transformation, I am filled with an immense respect for this old, uncultured peasant who knew how to bring about a work worthy of God" - The Narrator of The Man Who Planted Trees

Hello! I would like to talk about this wonderful film, The Man Who Planted Trees by examining its importance to every animator and why I believe every animator should see this film. After seeing this film, I felt not only admiration towards Elzéard Bouffier, but towards every animator that has ever animated anything.


Elzéard Bouffier, to me, represents a lot animators. Many animators take so much of their time and go through so many hardships in order to get into a great result that can make great entertainment for other people. While not every animator achieves this, it is a goal that we all share and are determined to achieve. Elzéard Bouffier is the same way with his determination of planting trees. He didn't care about what other people thought or what other people did, he just wanted to plant some damn trees. He wanted to restore beauty in such a desolate world. Animators make entertainment for people so that we can provide a way to "escape" the real world. We as animators dedicate ourselves to bring such entertainment. I have heard people refer to animators as somewhat "gods" in their own universes. While this is a somewhat egotistical comment about ourselves, there is some truth in this. I would like to reword the previous quote above and use it to answer the "gods" comment:

"Animators rely on their own physical (literally like no sleep and sitting at a computer/drawing board for days) resources to create entertainment from the real world into a land of Canaan, I am convinced that despite everything, the human condition is truly admirable. But when I take into account the constancy, the greatness of soul, and the selfless dedication that was needed to bring about this entertainment, I am filled with an immense respect for even animator who knows how to bring about a work worthy of God."

This is a film where animators, who feel down about their path, can feel more determined and feel hopeful to create great entertainment. From personal experience, I can definitely tell you this has made me very hopeful, and I hope you find it hopeful as well for your own creations.

Thanks for reading fellow animators! If you would like to expand on this idea, comment down below!

See You Space Cowboy

The Man Who Planted Trees


Watching The Man Who Planted Trees, I felt a pleasant sense of peaceful happiness. Overall, it was not what I expected in that the plot did not take any dark turns, nor hurtle into a conflict. Throughout the entire movie, I was expecting World War I and II to tragically demolish poor Elzeard Bouffier's planted forest. After all, a major setback is what we are usually taught is needed in a story to increase tension. However, at the end of every tragedy, Bouffier's forest never faltered. The film stayed optimistic from start to finish.

Why did they do this? Well, seeing how the film is meant to be an allegory that shows how one man, with mere dedication, can make such a huge difference towards the happiness of thousands of people, a major tragedy would not serve this purpose well. The movie is to show how Bouffier triumphs in the end all on his own.

Other than that, I haven't watched a lot of animated films with such a nice style. Sure, it's not stellar and paintakingly amazing, but it's nice in its own way in that it uses such a traditional grainy minimalist look.

Other than that, good job Canada, you win again.

The Man Who Planted Trees: An Epic

This short film was adorbsssssssss. The End.

Creation and Destruction

       While watching The Man Who Planted Trees, I was amazed by the combination of an impressive use of style, detail, and plot which built of each other flawlessly.  However, the plot of this film was the most intriguing part in my opinion.  I felt that the progression of the old man’s efforts, coupled with the narrator’s constant amazement conveyed the underestimated power of creation that humans possess.  The juxtaposition of both WWI and WWII against the old man’s almost inhuman success furthered this theme by showing that two of the most terrible wars in history impede his progress, and didn’t have such a lasting impact on the world.  This is clearly illustrated through the contrast between the vague and non-descriptive war scenes against the vivid nature scenes, as seen below.







       These elements of the film leave me with a feeling of motivation, and hope for the future of the world, because our power to create is stronger than our power to destroy.  It also motivates me to improve the world because we can accomplish unthinkable goals if we put in the effort.


The Students Who Wrote Blogs Posts (and this is one amongst many)

Hello peers and compunions, another post is upon us, and this time is for The Man Who Planted  Trees. Warning, I'm probably just gonna go into a lot of ramblings I guess so, yeah keep that in mind.

The use of the frosted frame in this film was fantastic - it gave the animation a very misty feeling to it, and gave the colored pencil a soft, fuzzy texture. The texture of the animation helped give the story a feeling of magic and misty mystery. As said in the story, many believed the fast growth of the forest was made by some miracle of nature, and that no one man could create a whole forest. And so it is a wonder that one man could  plant all of those trees, that someone so incredible must have had magic. And it is this sense of magic that Elzéard Bouffier was almost a force of nature or a spirit of nature himself, and also gave in a visual sense, perhaps how mysterious and wonderful the experiences of the narrator felt. And the fuzzy texture, almost gave the film a dream-like feeling just like how some memories feel like when recalling them.


Another thing I really appreciated about this film, were the sweeping landscape pans.


They really helped give a grand sense of scale. Since the land was so important, seeing so much of it and its growth was key to the story. And often, like in other films, dramatic pans help give a feeling of awe to landscapes, and these dramatic pans combined with the fuzzy animation give a fantasy, children's-story feel. Another thing to consider in just the overall order we watched the films in, in which case the peacefulness and, in a way, pureness seemed even stronger when contrasted by the other films. 

One thing that I'm not sure if I have a problem with or not, was the fact that there was no real enemy, or enemy-related climax. The closest I felt that there was a climax in the story was when the forest began to become noticed by others, and benefited the land and those who lived there, which really, was more visually overwhelming than anything else. But maybe this was ok; I'm partially not sure, because once again the films we had watched prior. After watching some dark films prior, The Man Who Planted Trees was refreshingly peaceful. 

Overall, I come away with this film feeling that I liked it, and it was indeed incredibly beautiful and well animated. The humble beauty, story, and message brings a fresh peace to mind and tastes of child's tale. But because of these things, or rather a lack in too many negative aspects, in a way it was hard to speak about. But that's just me.



SYDNEY BREAK:
Disclaimer: I was inspired by Sydney's post and so here where the jokes roll in.

Planting trees: The butt trees using the magical---


Which will someday grow into a booty-full forest~~~




Aaaaaaaannnnnnnddddd

Goodnight~













The Man Who Planted Trees

My initial thoughts on The Man Who Planted Trees was that it was a very long animation, however, once we got into the story I noticed that it did not seem that long, it actually seemed shorter than I thought. I really liked the art style frédéric bach, it seemed very whimsical and almost dreamlike.




Looking at other animation films that he has done, it seems that all of his films have that dream like style that makes the viewer fall into the story. The story itself was simple, yet still managed to get a point across. There was no conflict, yet the story itself remained interesting and engaging. Bouffier was a calm character that had a personal connection to the earth.  Something that I found interesting was that at one point in the film, it was revealed that his wife and son had died and because of that he moved into seclusion. It is as if he saw so much death that he decided that he wanted to provide life. Instead of humans taking life, he wanted to give it. Especially to an area that was barren and dead, he brought it life and meaning. Not only did Bouffier create life with nature, he gave life to the narrator. After meeting Bouffier, the narrator always came back, and always thought of him. In many ways, Bouffier provided the narrator's life with some meaning. 

During the film some other people and myself kept thinking something bad was going to happen to the forest. Some were expecting nature to destroy the forest. I kept thinking that the forest would burn down, something ironic like that. Nature destroying itself, in a sense like a body rejecting a new organ. However, that never happened and I think the action of thinking that something bad was going to happen says a lot about ourselves. It is as if we cannot have a happy ending, but the film proved that happy endings can be just as engaging, if not more telling about humans. Speaking about the fact that sometimes we learn the most in silence and sometimes meeting strangers provide us with an opportunity to get to know ourselves better and perhaps give us a chance to live a little more. I think another element that I really enjoyed about the film was the idea of happiness. All Bouffier did was plant trees and take care of some animals, he did not really talk to anyone, he just found solitude with nature. What he did made him happy and gave meaning to his life, I think we, as humans, tend to forget that sometimes slowing down and enjoying life is something we need to do. That to find happiness, we do not need to look all around the world and search in the smallest of corners, we can do anything that provides us with happiness. 

The use of color in the film also enhanced the storyline. Obviously at the beginning of the film when the narrator is in the desert, it is neutral colors, or plainer colors. 



This use of color almost shows the absence of life in the desert. It wasn't until the trees started growing that more vibrant colors were used, this could be just for the purpose of showing the many colors in nature, but it could also show the life that Bouffier brought to the lifeless desert.










The Man Who Planted Trees



                                                      
I loved this story. It has that feeling of a bedtime story to it and the narrator has an amazing voice. I found the animation extremely beautiful and it added to the story book feel. The roughness of the drawings and the fact that they didn't match up perfectly gave the animated parts a fluttery look. I liked this because it created a constant sense of motion and life like wind blowing through the trees.

                                                       
From a story point of view it was a nice change from Hunger and Ryan. It was a simple story of a man who saw something that needed help and took it upon himself. So often human power is looked on as something negative. Stories are more likely to tell of men destroying forests than they are to tell of men building them. I like that The Man Who Planted Trees illustrates that one person can do a whole lot of good. It also shows the power of dedication and the beauty of a simple life.

The Man Who Planted Swag


This is the story of the man who planted SWAG.
There once was a man who lived in a barren land. For as far as the eyes could see the land was dead and swagless. The one day a single lone man said YOLO, and he started to collect swag seeds so that he could grow SWAG on the boring land. He would collect swag seeds and then at night look at each carefully through his stunner shades. The man chose only the most swagilishish seeds to be planted. After he had collected 100 seeds he soaked them in red bull and beer, so they could have all of the nourishment that any swag seed would need in order to grow into a mighty SWAG tree. In the morning the man traveled out to the boring land to plant his swag seeds. Every day this man worked  to plant his SWAG trees and slowly as the years passed the mans SWAG trees grew until one day there was a mighty SWAG forest. And all of the swagless people journeyed to the forest to bask in the magnificent SWAG. None knew of the mans great quest of SWAG, but he didn't care, for the man said YOLO and continued to plant his SWAG seeds in other lands to increase the amount of SWAG in the world.
The Man Who Planted Swag
The Kanye-West Who Planted Trees
The Man Who Planted Akira
“The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of the mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one.”
― J.D. SalingerThe Catcher in the Rye

"Doing the right thing is boring, exhausting, and totally worth it in the long run."

 Film Crit Hulk, Twitter Post*


          People love them some martyrdom. It's noble. It gets you remembered. And it speaks to that little, almost negligible voice in your head that tells you to jump when you stand on the edge of a tall building. So naturally, the dramatic and ideologically simple world of Hollywood is full of martyrs. The silver screen teems with those who sacrifice themselves for what they believe in. William Wallace, Kyle Reese, The Iron Giant. But maybe that's crap. Maybe the people who make the most difference in the world aren't the ones who die for what they believe in, but the ones who live for what they believe in. And of those two types of people, Elzéard Bouffier is one of the latter.

          Bouffier's life is beyond humble. His job is to watch over animals. Any portion of time not spent tending to his flock is devoted to his true goal: to repopulate a desolate valley with trees. All day, he collects acorns, sorts them, and plants them in the arid soil. He expects only ten percent of his trees to survive. This notion does not deter him. Day after day, he plants hundreds and hundreds of acorns. Nobody is paying him to do this. Nobody even knows about it, save our narrator. Whatever he does, he does because he believes it is the right thing to do. Even when lush forests and thriving villages begin to spring up around him, the man never seeks recognition for his actions. He simply continues to plant trees. And in doing so, through sheer power of will, he becomes like as unto a god.

          The Man Who Planted Trees is not just a story of an extraordinary man. It is an imploration to us all, asking us to become more like Elzéard Bouffier. It asks us to plant our own trees, whatever form they may take. We should not rush blindly into the nobility of death, like our protagonist during the first World War. Instead, we should steer ourselves towards the humility of life. It will not be easy. It will be harsh and monotonous. Only ten percent of our efforts will bear fruition. And at the end of it, people may not be aware that we had anything to do with it at all. But it is undoubtedly the right thing to do. It creates beauty where thought impossible. It improves countless people's lives. It really is worth it in the long run. Only by living humbly can we hope to return water to the desert.



*Yeah ha ha this seems like a joke, but Film Crit Hulk publishes some of the most brilliant and insightful film articles on the web. Here's his piece on Gravity, which goes into the simplicity of the story and how it amplifies the visceral tone. I definitely had this piece in mind when I was writing my defense of Akira.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Hi everyone,

So again this was my first time seeing Grave of the Fireflies and I found it sad but  like Emily I thought it was going to be a lot sadder.  It did make my stomach drop but not enough for me to cry.  The main part that made me the most sad was when Setsuko told her brother to not leave her after Seita gets arrested.

The one thing that surprised me was that the movie did not end with Seita in the train station.  I'm curious how he ended up in the train station and why did he not stay and die in the home that Setsuko and he made.  I was also curious as to why the aunt did not react a lot when Seita and Setsuko leave.  The Aunt does pause as she is going into the house but continues to walk into the house without looking back.

The one thing that annoyed me was that Seita was very stubborn.  He could have brought his sister back to the Aunt's house and saved her life but he was too stubborn to do that.  Instead he just stole and had Setsuko suffer.

Overall though I thought it was a really endearing movie.  The characters were well developed and the symbolism was was beautiful.





Grave of the Fireflies


Grave of the Fireflies

I'm sorry I took so long to write this one but I had a really hard time thinking about what to say.

What can I say about this film? I feel like I couldn't come up with anything bad to say about it even if I tried. This film is on a whole different level, for animated films as a whole it is revolutionary and for Ghibli it is nothing like anything they have previously attempted. Animation wise it's phenomenal but that is to be expected with Ghibli films. (I feel like I'm using "animation" too much. Apologies to anyone reading this.) No but in all seriousness, this film perfectly captures the essence of war in a way that at no point feels cheesy or forced.

 I feel like it can be best explained and summarized through the feelings it expresses through its characters, and in turn evokes in its audience. If I were to pick out the most prominent three emotive themes of the film: hope, pride and loss.

Hope
Going into this film you know the children are doomed from the start and yet it still convinces you to hope they'll pull through. The fireflies also play a prominent role in the film, acting as a sort of leit motif. They symbolize life, the idea that it is fleeting, but also that it is constant; though they may die there will always be more to take their place. Another theory I've heard is that the fireflies represent the souls of fallen soldiers in battle so the final scene of them dancing amongst the fields of grass could be a glimmer of hope that they, as well as Setsuko who is seen playing with them, have found peace.

Pride
Seta throughout the film is Japan personified; He is prideful and hopeful at the films opening, though as Japans forces are vanquished, so to are his spirits. Seta's emotions and expectations are those instilled in him by his family and those around him. His pride stems from his father's position in the military, and his idea of responsibilities he must fulfill, such as taking care of his sister, are brought about by his aunt and his mother. Yet, despite the fact that he is barely old enough to be taking care of himself, let alone his sister, his pride wont allow him to submit and as for help.

Loss
I feel this one is evident. Aside from the obvious loss of their home, their mother, their wealth and happiness, loss is felt on a much greater scale. Continuing the metaphor for Japan, if Seta represents Japan on an emotive level, Setsuko is the country on a physical level. The weakness and sickness of her body is reflected in the lands and her malnutrition in the resources. 

Well that's all I've got to say, hopefully it wasn't completely false... Thanks for reading!
-Chloe

Sunday, October 26, 2014

Well That Was All ANIME-zing Adventure

Hello all it is I, Sa/Dako, and we have gathered here today (more like the last week) to watch and discuss these works from the land of the rising sun (not that the sun rises only Japan, believe me the sun, or at least that's what science tells me). So let's begin.


Princess Monon-okay That Was a Darn Good Film

Are you disappointed at the pun? Probably. Are you surprised? You shouldn't be. But despite how much you may want to strangle me for my dumb word-play you have to acknowledge that unlike me, Princess Mononoke (Mononokehime) was not disappointing, or at least pretty darn swell. From having some fantastic art and animation to some powerful female characters, Princess Mononoke can be praised on several levels, but the one I'll be focusing on will be the themes brought out by the contrasts within the characters..
There are quite a bit of themes presented throughout the film, such as man vs. nature, mortal/man vs. spirits, and the change of the world with old vs. new technology. Throughout all of these themes, one of the ways these contrasts were shown were through characters having almost dual identities, or rather going through physical transformations in order to show the changes within them. This applies to most of the main characters, such Ashitaka, San, The Deer God, and in a way Lady Eboshi. Ashitaka's transformation is obvious in the manifestation of the wound on his arm; it shows the struggle between him as a mortal man and the powerful angry spirit revolting against him.




For San, she has her dual identity is as both human and spirit/animal. Being born of human, she has the weaknesses of a human such as her mortality, lack of physical power, and in ways, her human emotions, as well as being seen as unequal and even inadequate to other spirits, and being thought as sick or possessed by other humans. Despite this, San actively works against her human origins to prove not only to the other spirits that she is worthy to fight amongst them, but also to prove to her adopted mother, the God Moro, that she is useful. She additionally has grown up to see the atrocities performed by Lady Eboshi on the forest and thus honestly believes in her cause. Another character that has an obvious transformation, is the Deer God.


The Deer God has a literal transformation, making his contrast perhaps the most obvious. He represents one of the most powerful spirits in the movie, who is being by Lady Eboshi and the Emperor, the humans. Thus, his existence is the contrast to Lady Eboshi and the monk to show the theme of man vs. nature, and old vs. new. Additionally, his transformation from his physical form into his spiritual form is representative of mortal vs. spiritual, as well as his death, as Ashitaka points out at the end that although the body of the Deer God is dead, the spirit lives on through life and death. On another note about the Deer God himself, many comment on the creepyness of the Deer God's face –-



Many are off-put by the eery, human-like eyes, and suspicious half smile, and in some instance some have wished it were different. But something we've talked about, and I will repeat, is how the design of the face is really important. In looking back at how many viewed gods, they were seen as powerful and sometimes scary, because humans are supposed to honor and respect gods, and sometimes that requires a little fear. And in that sense, the face creates a shock factor for the audience, which may have been intended.


And now, we look at Lady Eboshi; although for the most part, she stands in contrast to the Deer Spirit/ San as the humans with the weapons, she later herself goes through her own change, as at the end of the movie, she decides to turn over a new leaf.


After Moro bites off her arm, she essentially decides it's time to quit. Perhaps this shows that we should never underestimate the power of the spirits.


There are still other transformations, such as those of the boars filled with rage. But this will be where I end it. Besides the basic contrast of the characters and themes, there are other things that contrast about this movie as well. In the first place, many will agree out of Hayao Miyazaki's films, this is quite the graphic piece. Also, as Susan Napier points out in Anime from Akira to Howl's Moving Castle, “The film defamiliarizes two important icons in Japanese culture, the myth of th feminine as long-suffering and supportive and the myth of the Japanese as living in harmony with nature...” (p. 233, Napier) This shows that Princess Mononoke contrasted other Japanese films at the time, bringing forth characters that broke traditional story archetypes when it was first screened in Japan.


Grave of the Fire *cries*



Oh look at that another pun –- incredible! Anyway, if my puns don't make you cry from how terrible they are, than this movie will at LEAST make you consider it. (Unless you're maybe Chloe cause I don't think Chloe can physically cry at movies) With the double-hit combo of watching small children slowly die and watching their still-young older sibling fall into a world of pain, many leave sad, and wondering about their siblings. But what makes this movie sad, for both Japanese and other audiences alike? A lot of reasons and we all know it.
To begin with my own experience, one of the things that I feel really impacted my first viewing of Grave of the Fireflies (though this was my second time watching it), was the shock factor. I had heard previously from a few friends that it was a surprisingly sad movie, and so when I heard from my parents that they had found it on DVD I thought “Why not, it's Ghibli it really couldn't possibly be that sad.”

Well, I was obviously wrong. I'll admit, I didn't physically cry as I very rarely ever actually cry at any movies or TV shows, but I was on the inside. I finished that movie feeling like my heart had been slapped by Totoro and my brain was trying to figure out how to feel about that. The fact that GOTF was unlike other Ghibli movies really caught me off. Expecting perhaps a mildly sad but touching movie, my expectations left me like had been run over by the harsh paws of the catbus. And in this sense I do regret telling many of you beforehand how sad this was, because maybe than you would have felt this pain.

Another reason for Grave of the Fireflies to release the tears is probably the reality in it. Unlike many Ghibli films released in America, GOTF took place during a time that actually occurred in history and had no real fantasy or magic to it. Without those two things, it gets harder for us to separate from this movie as well as knowing that this could have really happened. And for the Japanese audience, this film may have brought back memories of the war, and personal family stories. Also, the common of experience of being a sibling, and imagining if one had to do what Seita had to do. All these were very real situations, which means there was very little room for viewers to escape and not feel the disappearance of hope for Seita and Setsuko.
My final and very important element, is the fact that this film was animated AND, as Susan Napier said, “...nostalgia for a disappearing past.” (p. 32, Anime from Akira to Howl's Moving Castle, Napier) Often, when people in the West see cartoons they think of kids shows; and back in the day, Japanese audiences thought similarly. Thus, it adds to the shock when something like GOTF comes around, taking something that is in ways associated with children and breaking that line. And it reminds us of our past, and how responsibilities, like caring for your dieing loved one, breaks that peaceful past.
In the end whether you did or did not cry at Grave of the Fireflies, this film will always be credited as one of the ones along with Akira that helped set the tone in Japan for adult animation. It will always be considered an interesting look at the interpretation of a time in history, as well as something you wonder how a 5-year-old would consider their favorite movie.




IKEA (Akira)
Alternative Title: Akir-ious Movie

Did you get that title? Me neither. Did you get the entirety of Akira? Probably not. Out of these three features, Akira was the only one I had never seen before, and from experiencing it for the first time let me tell you what consistently captivated me a whole chunk of the time –-

THE ANIMATION.

I know not everyone liked it, or were really peeved by the style, but I just remember when I first watched the first scene of when the gang members enter the bar I was just thinking –-


Like yo, that lip sync though. I know for several reasons why I was so impressed. For one, I was just watching the fluidity and thought about how many frames that must have taken. No wonder this movie's framous! Not to mention when this was made, which earns itself some mad cred. Nothing digital, and for anime, pretty early.
Other than the animation, I still thought it was interesting at points. It definitely had its weak spots, like character backstory,some explanations (like the pills) and why Tetsuo's forehead is like its own continent –- but overall, it was interesting and definitely a cult film. I did really love the shots, and animation of the buildings. My final word would probably be, that it feels incomplete, at least story wise for what they give in the movie. I could see some people liking the mystery left by the gaps in characters in a weird sense but after hearing about Sydney speak about the manga, (which I now intend to read whenever I can collect me some time) I know there's a lot more in-depth story buried under all that Tetsuo. But until then, the movie. Despite its fallbacks, I also can still see how this film really impacted so many anime and western film today (not Kanye though) and give it mad respect for that. It jumpstarted a generation and paired with Grave of the Fireflies really set the possibilities for mature and interesting animation. Overall I say I enjoyed it, though I really look forward to the manga for filling in gaps.

Let's just hope that there really isn't anything under that stadium though.



Did I do ok? I hope so. I also wish we had some more time for this section, but I guess time just kinda doesn't let things happen. Well it was fun having this venture, looking through movies I've already seen and also watching what looked like a bunch of psychic green benjamin buttons and motorcycles. Till next time friends~