La Planete Sauvage
Despite the our classes’
commonly negative opinion towards La
Planete Sauvage, which critiques the lack of story structure and quality of
animation, I saw value in the film.
Initially, the film’s strange setting put me off, but as the film
developed and more of the visual style was exposed, I appreciated its striking
originality. Additionally, I think the
film successfully created an alternate world that was intriguing and strange
enough to completely deviate from the world as we know it. In other words, many artists attempt to
envision alternate worlds but fail because their worlds are too fundamentally
similar to the ordinary world.
However, objectively, I
agree that the film fell short in multiple avenues. The story deviated from traditional format in
how the main character, Terr, remained undeveloped. He had no underlying flaw to overcome,
leading to a lack of character arc. In
effect, I felt little emotional connection and therefore cared less if he
survived. Though, the story centered on
the story of the “Om” people and not solely Terr. I certainly involved myself emotionally in
the struggle of the people to survive amidst the opposition from “Draag” and
other tribes of their own race. In that
regard, I think the story is more whole.
The animation style
contained movement of an extremely minimal degree, which on the surface
suggests a lack of quality or effort.
However, I think the consequential eeriness enhances the tone of the
film, which presents a strange, unfamiliar planet with unnerving humanlike
inhabitants. The Draag characters
animate with little discernable emotional intent, appearing emotionless and
therefore strange and inhuman. Such
creatures dominate over the human Oms, who express a great amount of emotional
depth. The dynamism of the Oms indicates
that Laloux intentionally decided to minimize animation with the Draags, a
choice I view as effectual.
Les Triplettes des Belleville
In additional opposition
to the consensus, I despised Les
Triplettes des Belleville! Perhaps
my opinion stems from the film’s insincere tone, but I viewed the film as being
superficial and quite stereotypical. A
great deal of scenes in the film held little to no importance to the story, highlighting
an undesirable sense of randomness. Perhaps I have
exaggerated, but I sense the story could be condensed much further. I felt much confusion when I had to switch my
thinking to believing not the cyclist grandson, but the grandmother was the
main character. Clarification of this
story element would have enhanced the story, in at least my opinion. One of Les
Triplettes des Belleville’s redeeming qualities lied in the character
design, which augmented the personality of each character. The slender cyclist grandson’s budging legs, the
stocky square shape of the unmoving henchmen, and the dopey round dog on stilt
legs each contributed to an immaculate visual style.
I fully agree with you on the character design, and also recognize your point about confusion and seemingly unnecessary scenes. I feel like if every movie only has scenes that have some sort of point, then it becomes too straightforward and the plot becomes bare. But I understand.
ReplyDelete